Language in use  
English Language & Linguistics

English Language

 

Food (".. thin strips of mole poached in Ovaltine")

The language of food critics is a linguistic area rich in exaggeration and descriptive hyperbole.

An example from The Sunday Times by A A Gill : "The lobster risotto would only have been exciting if we had pushed it up our noses". More A A Gill restaurant reviews here.

Another from the same paper, by wine critic Kate Spicer: "Blackwell Rum did that rare thing and evoked an image, not just words. This is demerara sugar with great legs in beautiful underwear and heels. It is a liquid Helmut Newton photograph."

A case which reached the Court of Appeal was based on the right of a restaurant critic to describe a meal.

The Irish News’ restaurant critic, Caroline Workman, criticised the quality of the food, the staff and the joyless, smoky atmosphere of Goodfellas pizza restaurant in West Belfast.

After one ring of squid . . . it became clear the dishes were made with the cheapest ingredients on the market”
“Our main courses arrived in as much time as it took the chef in view to rip open three blue industrial-size bags of processed cheese”
“The staff have no more time to be involved with their customers than those in a motorway cafe”

In an article in the Times of March 15th 2008 their food critic, Giles Coren wrote a description of his visit (below).

To what extent do you think hyperbole and unexpected juxtaposition of descriptions adds to the humour? ("resembled a mixture of budget muesli and aquarium gravel served in an old man's slipper"; " I'd have guessed I was eating thin strips of mole poached in Ovaltine").

What other literary devices are used to develop the article?

Is there anything offensive in the article? Do you think restaurants are fair game for food critics? Compare food reviews with articles by Jeremy Clarkson who also uses hyperbole for comic effect.

Goodfellas is in Kennedy Way, just off the Falls Road, a Catholic-owned joint on the edge of a loyalist enclave strong on militant murals, marching and, not so long ago, rifle-volley shows of strength. The windows are smoked dark and impenetrable. The patch of grass outside is littered with empty bottles of WKD Blue. Two sets of entry doors, of which the outer one was formerly remote-controlled, testifying to times when the threat of a loyalist "spraying" was very real. Times when the least of your worries was a dodgy restaurant review. Gordon Ramsay at Claridge's this most certainly ain't.

It is about three-quarters full inside, which is impressive on a wet week-night in March, and almost everyone is fat. Obesity in West Belfast seems to be even worse than in the poorest areas of mainland Britain. There is what appears to be a hen party in the next room comprising 12 women seated around a large square table, each of whom, on her own, weighs as much as a whole hen night of women from Fulham. (I guess these are battery hens).
The men have big square heads and little pink faces, short spiky hair, stud earrings and big appetites. It's like Westlife got old and fat overnight, which they sort of have if you saw them on Al Murray the other night.

To be fair, the welcome is not, as The Irish News had it, "daunting" or negligent. A very pretty and charming waitress seats me at a very small table next to some very large people. She brings me a glass of cola (Goodfellas has no licence) which is, indeed, pretty flat and not especially cold and (as The Irish News critic claimed) clearly not poured from a bottle but shot from a gun. So much for decommissioning.

The menu is terrifying. Hundreds of choices – 14 starters, 14 chicken dishes, 15 pizzas (including "The Whop"), 13 pasta dishes as well as a do-it-yourself option, where six styles of pasta can be paired with a cream or tomato sauce and any permutation of 25 further ingredients to create millions of possibilities (if you've ever fancied rigatoni with smoked salmon, sweet-corn and barbecue sauce, Goodfellas is the place to get it).

Then there are ten beef dishes with ten sauce options (100 more possible combos there) including the alluring-sounding "gravy". Half a dozen pig dishes, some specials and 24 contorni (this is an Italian restaurant, don't forget) of which eight are potato.

Portions are massive. Waitresses struggle by with Brobdingnagian tureens of pasta and pizzas like dustbin lids (but smellier). I order a small far-falle all' arrabiata, and then the chicken marsala – the very dish that Caroline Workman, the Irish News critic, had described as being served in a sauce so revoltingly sweet as to render the dish inedible. I nip to the loo. Two of the cubicle doors are locked but the third opens, straight into the kitchen. Most unusual. This does not happen at Le Gavroche. Perhaps I am spoilt.

My little pasta dish arrives. A huge disappointment: it is fine. Not fine in the sense of tasting like something an Italian would dream of eating. But fine in the sense of being the sort of thing I used to cook as a student when I was too stoned to dial a pizza.

The chips I ordered are fine, too. Precut and frozen, yes, but that's normal even in a good gastropub, and these are nice and crispy. I am gutted. It looks like there will be no opportunity to test my rejuvenated confidence in a restaurant critic's right to freedom of expression.

Then my pollo marsala arrives: an oval dish containing a chocolate coloured liquid and pale lumps of something. I eat a mouthful. The sweetness is, indeed, alarming. As is the consistency of the meat. Without the court papers to confirm what I had ordered, I'd have guessed I was eating thin strips of mole poached in Ovaltine.

It is revolting. It is ill-conceived, incompetent, indescribably awful. A dish so cruel I weep not only for the animal that died to make it, but also for the mushrooms. Ms Workman said it was inedible but, to be honest, as it sits before me, congealing quietly, I cannot leave it alone but return to it every few minutes with the grim fascination of a toddler mesmerised by a pile of its own faeces, nibbling at it, gurning with revulsion, then nibbling some more. If you've ever sniffed your finger after scratching your arse, and then done it again, then this dish may not be entirely wasted on you.

A note on the menu says: "All of our meals are freshly prepared." When I ask for parmesan cheese, they bring a pot of that powdery pregrated grit that smells like dessicated dog vomit. I thought I'd better have a pudding, so I ordered the apple crumble. Alas, what they brought me resembled a mixture of budget muesli and aquarium gravel served in an old man's slipper. The accompanying custard was pleasant only in that it reminded me of a scented pencil eraser I used to enjoy sucking in the hot summer of 1976.

Background to the court case is here.

Michael Winner wrote a regular restaurant review for the Sunday Times. Entitled “Winner’s Dinners” he was famous for being critical about the poor standard of service and low quality of food and its presentation.

The following extracts from a review of 12.12.2004 are examples of critical hyperbole and bear examination for their use of similes, similes and adjectival phrases.

“This is the tackiest, most ridiculous hotel with an appallingly run restaurant serving (“serve” is an inaccurate use of the word) the worst imaginable fodder.”
“The banisters were painted in white gloss and ingrained with dirt. The walls were tired. There was a hook where a picture once hung, with horrid marks where the picture had been. There was an odd smell.
The suite comprised the two most garish rooms I’ve ever been in. The lounge had a sofa, a couple of small chairs, a tiny, low round table and a dead plant. It was largely empty.”

“The Crabwall bread was warm but tasted like it was old and heated up. After one small mouthful I left it.”

“ A freebie was announced as ‘chicken and tarragon rillete’ It had no discernible taste and a woolly texture,
My ‘presetorine’ first course was like a dreary slice of meat pie at a catered lunch for 800 people. Accompanying it were some tired leaves and a sun-dried tomato, which tasted like a pickle gone wrong.
The main course ‘pan roast loin of pork, boulangere potatoes, tomato Provençal, crackling, port jus’ was a slab of hard, atrocious pork, nothing crackling anywhere near it, with soggy potatoes. I left almost all of it.”

“The [dessert] plate was decorated like a touring version of Waitrose Food Illustrated. It tasted as if it came from a newsagent’s fridge.”

“[Adrian] provided me with the worst food I’ve had in decades.”

 

Hotel

Tackiest, most ridiculous

restaurant

appallingly run

Fodder

Worst imaginable

banisters

Painted in white gloss, ingrained with dirt

walls

tired

bread

Crabwall, warm, old, heated up

Rillete

No discernible taste, woolly texture

Presetorine

Like a dreary slice of meat pie at a catered lunch for 800 people

Main course

slab of hard, atrocious pork, nothing crackling anywhere near it, with soggy potatoes

plate

decorated like a touring version of Waitrose Food Illustrated
It tasted as if it came from a newsagent’s fridge

In rhetoric the term for exaggeration is “Hyperbole”

1. Give examples of the most probable exaggerations from Winner's piece.

2. Identify and explain the effect of his
• superlatives
• similes

3. Explain the effect of his choice of
• adjectives eg ‘woolly’, ‘tired’, ‘dreary’

 


 

 See also