|
|
Pragmatics
- what is it?
Definition
Pragmatics studies the factors that decide
our choice of language in social interaction.
It looks at the social rules that affect our choice.
It looks at the meaning of speech acts and the intention of the speaker
and includes information about the social status of the speakers, cultural
features such as politeness and formality, and both explicit and implicit
linguistic features.
Focus and content
Pragmatics overlaps at times with semantics,
stylistics, sociolinguistics,
psycholinguistics and discourse
analysis.
Aspects
Some of the aspects of language studied in pragmatics include:
(taken from Shaozhong
Liu’s pragmatics page.)
:
Deixis: meaning 'pointing to' something. In verbal communication
however, deixis in its narrow sense refers to the contextual meaning of
pronouns, and in its broad sense, what the speaker means by a particular
utterance in a given speech context.
Presupposition: referring to the logical meaning of a
sentence or meanings logically associated with or entailed by a sentence.
Performative: implying that by each utterance a speaker
not only says something but also does certain things: giving information,
stating a fact or hinting an attitude. The study of performatives led
to the hypothesis of Speech Act Theory that holds that a speech event
embodies three acts: a locutionary act, an illocutionary act and a perlocutionary
act (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1969).
Implicature: referring to an indirect or implicit meaning
of an utterance derived from context that is not present from its conventional
use.
Pragmaticians also explore why speakers can successfully
converse with one another in a conversation.
A basic idea is that interlocutors obey certain principles in their participation
so as to sustain the conversation. One such principle is the Cooperative
Principle which assumes that interactants cooperate in the conversation
by contributing to the ongoing speech event (Grice, 1975).
Another assumption is the Politeness Principle (Leech,
1983) that maintains interlocutors behave politely to one another,
since people respect each other's face (Brown & Levinson 1978).
A cognitive explanation to social interactive speech events was provided
by Sperber and Wilson (1986) who hold that in verbal communication
people try to be relevant to what they intend to say and to whom an utterance
is intended.
The pragmatic principles people abide by in one language
are often different in another. Thus there has been a growing interest
in how people in different languages observe a certain pragmatic principle.
Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural studies reported what is considered
polite in one language is sometimes not polite in another.
Criticisms
A traditional criticism has been that pragmatics does not have a clear-cut
focus.
Other complaints are that, unlike grammar which resorts to rules, the
vague and fuzzy principles in pragmatics are not adequate in telling people
what to choose in face of a range of possible meanings for one single
utterance in context.
However, there is a consensus view that pragmatics as a separate study
is necessary because it handles those meanings that semantics overlooks
(Leech, 1983)
The study of speech acts, for instance, provides explanations of sociolinguistic
conduct. The findings of the cooperative principle and politeness principle
also provided insights into person-to-person interactions.
Deixis, for instance, is important in the teaching of reading. Speech
acts are often helpful for improving translation and writing.
|
|
|