|
|
Is the hyphen
making a dash for extinction?
from The Times, August 21, 2003
Is the hyphen making a dash for extinction?
By Robin Young
THE hyphen may be heading for extinction, according to the editors of
a new edition of the Oxford Dictionary of English published today.
Angus Stevenson, one of the editors, said yesterday: “Our research
showed that overall the hyphen is now used only half as much as it was
ten years ago.” And that is despite a new use found for aberrant
hyphens, which are now being slotted into phrasal verbs, as in “now
is the time to top-up your pension” or “this website was set-up
by Vicky”.
But Mr Stevenson said: “This use of hyphens is not yet accepted
as standard English and should be avoided in careful writing.”
It is easy, though, to see how it has come about. “Nouns derived
from phrasal verbs, such as ‘it’s a set-up’ or ‘time
for a top-up’ have long been typically hyphenated,” Mr Stevenson
said. “The new usage is an extension of that.”
Up to 20 or 30 years ago, he added, compounds formed by placing one noun
in front of another were generally hyphenated, as in “fish-shop”
or “dog-bowl”. Now such words are generally written separately
(eg cat flap) or run together, as in “website” or “airfare”.
“In the 1950s,” Mr Stevenson added, “even familiar words
such as teenager and lipstick were often hyphenated, and street signs
used to hyphenate names: for example, St-Giles or West-Street”.
The Oxford lexicographers assessed the hyphen’s present parlous
condition by comparing two corpuses of complete texts, databases of 100
million words each, prepared ten years apart. They discovered that there
were twice as many hyphens in the British National Corpus, prepared in
the early 1990s, as in the new Oxford English Corpus. Mr Stevenson said:
“Hyphens are still found clarifying longer phrases, such as ‘trade-union
reforms’, or where there is a verb involved, as in ‘calcium-derived
substances’.” Apostrophes, Mr Stevenson thinks, may be next
to go.
Tim Austin, the author of The Times Style and Usage Guide, said that it
would be a “great pity” if the hyphen were to disappear altogether.
“It enables language to be used in a fuller and richer way, as indeed
does the apostrophe,” said Mr Austin, who recently retired after
ten years as chief revise editor of The Times. But he added that hyphenation
was “always a very contentious area” and every media organisation
needed its own rules on the topic.
* Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford University Press, £35.
Do some simple research of your own to find
out whether your reading confirms the changes described above.
What will be gained and what lost by the death
of the hyphen?
Do you agree that "It enables language
to be used in a fuller and richer way"?
Is the apostrophe likely to go the same way?
What will be gained and what lost by the death
of the apostrophe
|
|
|